In Germany, a Muslim woman expresses her anger

Image: Jihad Watch

The phrase “she completely lost it” is commonly used to describe someone having a mental breakdown, a moment of madness. But in this case, it misrepresents the situation entirely. The woman in question had not descended into madness. Rather, she was an outraged Muslim woman furious at being made subject to the laws of a non-Islamic state — Germany — whose system had, in her view, wronged her.

Reports suggest that she was a former student at Goethe University in Frankfurt who had failed academically. This academic failure came with real consequences: the termination of her student loan and the expiration of her student visa. From her perspective, this was an intolerable injustice — not a legal outcome, but a moral betrayal by a state she viewed as inferior. She stood in the university library, her voice raised in fury, not due to mental instability, but because she could not accept that an "infidel" system had denied her what she believed was her rightful entitlement — continued financial support and residency in Germany.

Her rage was not silent. She screamed at those around her, condemning the “Infidels,” a term rooted in Islamic theology to describe non-believers, whom she considered the “lowest of creatures.” In contrast, she saw herself, a Muslim, as among the “best of peoples” — a view endorsed by specific Qur’anic verses. Her grievance? That the German state had failed to provide her with continued benefits, despite her no longer qualifying for them. That the same state dared to consider deporting her to Morocco, her country of origin, merely because her visa had lapsed.

She demanded to be heard. In the middle of the library, she shouted her fury at a system she did not believe had any authority over her. She denounced the secular structure of the German state, the co-educational environment in which men and women studied side by side, and the absence of hijabs on female students — all of which she saw as violations of Islamic propriety. In her eyes, what was truly shameful was not her public outburst, but the failure of the German people to live by the laws of Islam.

In a now-deleted video clip uploaded to Instagram, her voice can be heard exclaiming, “I am ashamed of what you are doing here.” What she found shameful, clearly, was not her conduct, but the liberal, secular nature of her surroundings — a culture that does not enforce Sharia law, that permits freedoms she abhors, that tells Muslims like herself they must obey the laws of the host country.

According to witnesses, she even demanded the implementation of Sharia law — a system rooted in Islamic scripture, practiced in nations like Saudi Arabia and Iran, where women’s rights are heavily restricted, homosexuality and premarital sex are punishable, and corporal punishments such as whipping and stoning are sanctioned.

This woman, no longer a student, had evidently returned to the university library with the express purpose of protesting what she saw as the unjust consequences of her academic failure. In a fit of rage, she climbed atop tables, kicked over books and laptops, and shoved away students who tried to intervene.

The disturbance, which began in the afternoon, was brought under control only after the university's security services alerted the police at 4:02 p.m. Emergency services arrived by 4:10, and by 4:23, she had been provisionally arrested. A police spokesperson, Bintu Lond, confirmed the incident and revealed that the 31-year-old woman was from Bad Homburg and had previously been enrolled at the university. She was taken to a hospital, reportedly for a mental health evaluation.

But to call her condition a “mental health problem” is to obscure the deeper issue. Her outrage stemmed not from delusion or illness, but from her belief that Infidels had no right to rule over Muslims. In her mind, it was not a bureaucratic outcome but a spiritual insult: non-believers had stripped her of her student loan and threatened to deport her. This was, for her, unacceptable.

To her, financial support from the German government was not aid; it was an obligation — a kind of pre-Islamic jizyah, or tax, that non-Muslims owe to Muslims. And her visa? A right, not a conditional privilege. Her belief system holds that Muslims have a divine right to dwell in lands of the Infidels, not to be judged or expelled by them, but to eventually rule over them, until Islam prevails universally.

Goethe University confirmed the incident, noting that security responded quickly and escorted the woman from the building. However, some eyewitnesses disputed this, saying it took nearly 15 to 20 minutes before security arrived — a delay that could have proven disastrous had the woman been armed. Given her level of rage, one can easily imagine a far more tragic scenario had she had a weapon at hand.

Authorities and media outlets are quick to describe such events as moments when someone simply “snapped.” But that allows them to sidestep the ideological motivations that often drive such behavior. In this case, her actions were consistent with certain interpretations of Islamic doctrine — doctrines that portray Muslims as inherently superior to non-believers and entitled to privileges that should not be denied, especially by Infidels.

There was no loss of control, no mental break. What we saw in that library was a deliberate expression of religious and ideological fury — a refusal to recognize the legitimacy of the German state or its laws. She failed as a student, refused to accept the consequences, and returned to the university not to study, but to protest, shout, and disrupt. Her worldview is clear: the Infidels wronged her, and she was within her rights to condemn them — loudly and publicly.

Now that her visa has expired, there is only one appropriate course of action: immediate deportation. She should be returned to Morocco, and Germany must ensure that she is not allowed to re-enter. Her case is a cautionary tale, one that highlights the failure of Angela Merkel’s 2015 migrant policy, marked by the now-famous slogan “Wir schaffen das” — “We can manage this.”

In hindsight, Germany could not manage the mass influx of Muslim migrants — not socially, not economically, and certainly not culturally. Many have come not to integrate, but to take advantage of a generous welfare state that provides free housing, health care, education, and financial support. Integration has failed where entitlement and hostility toward Western values have taken root.

Describing such episodes as mere mental breakdowns only obscures the truth: this was not a lapse in sanity, but a clear display of grievance rooted in a supremacist religious ideology. She was not mad — only furious that the Infidels dared to enforce their laws, and worse, to deny her what she believed was her rightful due.

(This Article was originally published by Jihad Watch)