Judge Condemns Asylum Claims Abused by Criminals as Three Algerians Jailed for London Thefts

Image: Jihad Watch

A senior judge has delivered a scathing rebuke of three Algerian nationals who entered the UK under the guise of seeking asylum, accusing them of using the system as a “cover” for full-time criminality. The men—identified as Adam Zawi, Oussama Fadage, and Aouidj Abderaouf—have now been imprisoned after a brazen daylight robbery in London’s financial district.

The Crime and Arrest

On July 30, the three men targeted evening drinkers unwinding after work in the heart of London’s Square Mile. They entered The Walrus and The Carpenter pub, where they stole two rucksacks belonging to patrons. The contents reportedly included high-value electronic devices and other personal property. Following the thefts, law enforcement traced the culprits via CCTV and recovered the stolen goods.

At the time of their arrest, Zawi was residing in a three-star hotel paid for through public funds, under his asylum claim. Both Fadage and Abderaouf had previous theft convictions.

Harsh Words from the Bench

Under District Judge Michael Snow, the sentencing hearing became a forum not just for punishment but for sharp criticism. The judge accused the defendants of “abusing Britain’s kindness” and treating asylum protections as a pathway to crime.

He challenged Zawi’s claim to be 21, suggesting the defendant had grown older than stated, remarking, “You must think I was born yesterday if you believe he is 21.” The judge made it clear that he viewed all three men as “committed criminals” with no realistic prospect of rehabilitation.

Further, Judge Snow insisted that even if early release were possible, the Home Office should consider their deportation. He also directed that details of their convictions be forwarded to immigration authorities. An application is reportedly underway to ban them from entering the City of London in the future.

Sentences Imposed

• Zawi and Fadage each received one year’s imprisonment.

• Abderaouf was sentenced to 36 weeks in jail.

Broader Implications

This case has already drawn attention beyond the courtroom. Many commentators and media outlets cite it as an example—whether fairly or not—of some asylum seekers exploiting the protections and benefits extended by the UK. However, it is important to emphasize that one case does not typify all asylum seekers, many of whom seek refuge legitimately, abide by the law, and contribute to society.

Judicial statements like those from Judge Snow can also influence public sentiment, and may stoke debates over immigration policy, asylum procedures, and deportation rules. The balancing act for governments is to maintain humane protections for genuine refugees, while preventing abuse of the system by bad actors.

(This Article was originally published by Jihad Watch)